I remember in the 1980s when John Prescott was Labour's Employment Spokesman. Every month when the unemployment figures were released, Prezza came on the television claiming the figures were a mixture of lies and fiddles. I don't know whether he came on the TV every month, or perhaps the BBC and ITV just replayed the same footage month after month - his rhetoric never changed.
James Purnell, the Work and Pensions Secretary, has now decided he is going to direct his attention to Incapacity Benefit, because (surprise, surprise) many of our work-shy fellow citizens prefer the extra cash Incapacity Benefit gives them over Unemployment Benefit. One wonders if Mr Purnell will now come on the television and admit that the unemployment figures are a mixture of lies and fiddles? I won't hold my breath.
Not that Mr Purnell is advocating anything new. Frank Field thought the unthinkable 10 years ago and was rewarded by getting the order of the boot, but 10 years ago the economy was strong and Gordon Brown could spend and borrow all he liked. Having vast swathes of voters dependent on state hand-outs suited him. Now we are skint, so getting a million or so off benefits and back into work where they should be, is an attractive proposition.
Other commentators have noted the timing of this announcement. Those looking for conspiracy theories will say this is a swipe by Mr Purnell aimed directly at the prime minister. Why make an announcement now, days before the Glasgow East by-election? It's as good as saying vote for me today, and tomorrow we'll stop your benefits and make sure you earn an honest crust - probably for the first time in your life. Gordon Brown would have made sure this policy was announced when he was out of the country - just in case he got any flack - and as far as Glasgow East is concerned; so what? Labour will retain this seat, albeit with a vastly reduced majority and the party is expecting the worst anyway. I doubt this policy is going to make thousands of voters switch their allegiance. Nor do I think Purnell is jockeying for position if the leadership of his party becomes vacant. Most voters on hearing his name will say James who? They have never heard of him. John Major came from relative obscurity to become Foreign Secretary in the summer of 1989, and swiftly became Chancellor of the Exchequer. When the Conservatives did their hatchet job on Margaret Thatcher, Major was a household name. James Purnell's time - if indeed he is destined for the top job - is many years away. If he has any sense he will look at William Hague and realise it is a thankless task rebuilding your party after a general election defeat. Let someone else take charge, watch them fall and then put your hat in the ring.
The electorate should not be conned by this announcement. Labour has not had a Damascene moment and realised what Conservatives have been telling them that the welfare state is too large and welfarism is badly damaging the country. They may have stolen Tory policies, but it doesn't mean they believe in them. Gordon Brown has been forced into a corner - a corner of his own making - and if he wants to retain the votes of middle class voters, then this is a policy that may work. I'm sure it will not, as what we will probably end up with is Incapacity Benefit under a different name, with a reduction in claimants, but nowhere near enough. Labour is now dependant on the dependant and it can't reduce its dependency too much. Purnell is doing his master's bidding. By the time he rises further up the greasy pole within touching distance of the top job, the events of this week will be long forgotten. He can afford to preside over a disaster. Others, such as David Milliband, cannot.